TC 4 (team) -- Oral project proposal

Worth: 35 points
Assigned: 18 February 2009
Due: 12 March 2009 or 13 March 2009
Little Toy Blue
1 Varsity Drive
Suite 1973
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108

To: All Music Synthesizer Division engineers
From: Nikola Tesla, Vice President for Innovation
Subject:   Team music synthesizer project proposals
Date: 18 February 2009

Background

As you know, our company is interested in finding new applications for microprocessor-based music synthesizers. On 2 February 2009 you received a request for proposals. A preliminary proposal is due February 18, to be followed by a consultation with your project manager and among your team members to decide on the particular product you will propose. Each team will then present a formal proposal to management in oral format on March 12 or 13. The purpose of this memo is to lay out the guidelines for this presentation.

Deliverable

Remember you have been asked to propose a product and also to build a prototype. The purpose of your proposal is to describe and justify your product idea, and to lay out how you plan to build your prototype. Please refer to the February 2 memo for details.

Your proposal will be in the form of an oral presentation with projected slides in front of your colleagues and a team of evaluators (Chen, Hildinger, Alfano, Kominsky, Smith, Dydo, and Kempke). You must speak without written notes. Your team will have 12 minutes for your presentation, plus three minutes for questions and suggestions. Every team member should do a roughly equal part of the presentation. See below for guidelines for the presentation.

There will also be one required rehearsal for each team in the days preceding the presentation. We will start scheduling these soon. Each team should be prepared to deliver a preliminary version of their presentation at that time, and we will have feedback and suggestions to make the actual presentation as successful as possible.

Your team should bring a laptop with VGA output to show your presentation, both to the rehearsal and to the actual presentation. Let us know if this poses a problem for your team. Your team should also bring paper copies of your slides for the evaluators (three per page format is OK).

You can use the structure below as a starting point for structuring your presentation. We will be giving you more information on the format of the presentation and on how to deliver oral presentations.

Feel free to contact Dr. Hildinger with questions.

How to submit your work

After your team presentation, one member of the team should submit your PowerPoint slides here.

Oral presentation evaluation notes

We will be looking at content, structure, presentation and visuals. Here are some issues we will be concerned with--use this list as a guide as you develop your presentation, and see the grading scheme below.

Technical content and argumentation

Design and organization of the presentation

Design and use of visuals

Delivery (preparation and presentation)

Slide design: some goals

Key slides

Other guidelines

REHEARSE: This will take longer than you think. You need to be very concise.

TALK LOUDLY: Louder than you think--you may think you're speaking loudly, but you're probably not.


Grading scheme

Overview: 10%

Background of project summarized adequately and need for product clearly defined.
2 4 6 8 10

Project description: 20%

Proposed product, objectives, approach and rationale clearly described. Scope of prototype described clearly, with reasons for design decisions given.
4 8 12 16 20

Work plan: 10%

Schedule showing major tasks, products and responsibilities.
2 4 6 8 10

Organization: 20%

Presentation organized effectively to bring out and emphasize major points. Points delivered in appropriate order. Appropriate distribution of time to various topics.
4 8 12 16 20

Delivery: 20%

Speakers prepared and able to speak without notes in an orderly manner. Presentation well paced and within time constraints. Effective contact established with audience (audible, good eye contact and rapport). Good screen work (point specifically, stand by screen, don't block audience's view). Introductions and handoffs handled well.
4 8 12 16 20

Visuals: 20%

Slides well designed, legible, consistent and appropriate for the purpose. Slides cover all important points. Slides used effectively; good balance between talk, text on screen and visual information. Title slide (with title, team name, team member names, date). Overview-type slide (lays out problem statement/motivation for project and proposed solution). Agenda-type slide (lays out structure of talk or main content areas). Summary slide (reminds audience of main claims/"takeaway").
4 8 12 16 20

Total out of 100%: ________