TC 6 (oral presentation)
Assigned: 30 March 2009
Worth: 60 points
Due: 16 April 2009 or 17 April 2009
TC 7 (written report)
Assigned: 30 March 2009
Worth: 80 points
Due: 20 April 2009
| To: | All Music Synthesizer Division engineers |
| From: | Nikola Tesla, Vice President for Innovation |
| Subject: | Music synthesizer project reports (oral and written) |
| Date: | 30 March 2009 |
The date for presenting our music synthesizer demonstrations for Pixilated Studios is fast approaching. We know that all engineering teams have been developing their concepts and preparing their prototypes, and we look forward to seeing the results on April 16 and 17. However, we would like to make sure that your design process and decisions, and your recommendations for the future of your projects, are clearly documented. We are therefore asking you to present your work orally on April 16 or 17 and in writing the following Monday, April 20. The purpose of this memo is to specify the goals and requirements for these two reports.
In any design project, two things of value may be created: first, the product design itself, and second, the enhanced experiences and skills of the team members, which will be valuable in future projects. We will ask you to report on both of these aspects.
We have asked you to come up with a vision for your proposed product as it would be manufactured and marketed, but we have only required you to implement a limitedfunctionality prototype. In this report, we would like to hear about both, but with a primary focus on the prototype. You must cover such subjects as:
Note that these are content areas, not sections. The actual organization into sections is somewhat up to you, within the limits laid out below. All of these areas are important, and all of them need to have some attention paid to them. The ultimate "argument" of this report is that you did as well as you could, given the resources available to you and the obstacles you had to face. In some sense, the ultimate proof of this argument is that you have a working prototype, which you should be able to demo.
As described above, there are two deliverables, the oral presentation and the written report. Both are in formats that should be familiar by now.
As before, this will be presented as a team oral presentation using PowerPoint or equivalent, and a brief of your product. A rough rule of thumb for timing is as follows:
This adds up to a maximum of 20 minutes per team, and we will need to enforce this limit fairly strictly. Every member of the team should help develop the presentation and present part of it. You must speak without written notes.
Your team should bring your top.sof, music.mif, and PowerPoint file on a USB drive. Bring an initialized SD card if you need it in the demo.
We will provide a complete DE2 setup and a laptop to run PowerPoint and Quartus. We will also provide a projector and document camera. The document camera can project a live picture of the DE2 board during your demo. During your demo, you can switch between showing the VGA output from the DE2 and a live picture of your DE2 board.
Little Toy Blue hopes this presentation will be a serious, in-depth look at your project, process and outcomes, not a quick and dirty demo.
The written project report is a 10-15 page document (approximately). It should follow the structure below:
Remember the particulars of this format:
Some more format specs:
Feel free to contact Dr. Hildinger with questions.
Team introduced; forecast of talk given; background of project summarized adequately and need for product clearly defined.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Proposed product, objectives, approach and rationale clearly described. Scope of prototype described clearly, with reasons for design decisions given; clear description of prototype's capabilities and limitations.
| 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
Schedule showing major tasks, products and responsibilities.
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Clear statement of ideas for bringing the product to market; clear statement of lessons learned; mention of skills, tools and techniques that proved useful or not.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
Speakers prepared and able to speak without notes in an orderly manner. Presentation well paced and within time constraints. Effective contact established with audience (audible, good eye contact and rapport). Good screen work (point specifically, stand by screen, don't block audience's view). Introductions and handoffs handled well.
| 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
Slides well designed, legible, consistent and appropriate for the purpose. Slides cover all important points. Slides used effectively; good balance between talk, text on screen and visual information. Title slide (with title, team name, team member names, date). Overview-type slide (lays out problem statement/motivation for project and proposed solution). Agenda-type slide (lays out structure of talk or main content areas). Summary slide (reminds audience of main claims/"takeaway").
| 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
Concise but complete summary touching on all major aspects of the report; clear statement of problem, task, purpose, description of product and its functionality; brief assessment of project and ideas for marketing product.
| 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
Background of project summarized adequately and need for product clearly defined; product briefly described.
| 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
Final prototype described adequately both with regard to its appearance and functionality; same for finished product; development process fully described; ideas for bringing the product to market given; discussion of obstacles overcome and lessons learned.
| 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 |
Cover sheet, executive summary, table of contents; single-spacing, block paragraphs, bold section headings, adequate subheadings, page numbers; legible printing in readable typeface. Good syntax and usage; clear expression; good organization of material at the level of the section and the paragraph.
| 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 |